Most wardrobe advice assumes it knows your problem. This does not. Six questions, thirty seconds, and the output is which dimension is weakest — because the fix for "too much stuff" is completely different from the fix for "nothing matches", and doing the wrong one makes things worse.
What it measures
| Dimension | A low score means |
|---|---|
| Circulation | Most of what you own is not being worn — the issue is volume or visibility |
| Combination | Pieces do not match, so a full wardrobe still yields few outfits |
| Coverage | There are genuine gaps, and the answer is targeted buying rather than removal |
| Condition | The pieces doing the most work are wearing out and need replacing first |
| Findability | Storage is hiding your own clothes from you |
| Buying | Purchases are not working out, and the pattern is upstream of the wardrobe |
Why the weakest area matters more than the score
The total is a summary. The weakest dimension is the instruction.
A wardrobe scoring 55 because nothing combines needs a palette decision. A wardrobe scoring the same 55 because everything is worn out needs five replacements. Those are not the same job, and the total score cannot tell them apart — which is why the result names the specific one.
After the audit
Whatever comes back weakest, there is a next step:
- Circulation or findability — start with decluttering, then fix storage before buying anything.
- Combination — the capsule method is the direct answer, particularly the palette discipline.
- Coverage — take an inventory so the gaps are a list rather than a feeling.
- Condition — replace your five most-worn items. Nothing else changes how a wardrobe feels as quickly.
- Buying — run cost per wear on the next three things you are tempted by, before buying any of them.